The Merchant of Venice & Internal Audit

Ever wondered who the first internal auditors were? What skills they applied? What enterprises solicited their services and why. Those who know me, know I’m a firm believer in the idea that there is nothing new under the sun. Finding out the history of a profession and it’s evolution often reveals a lot more about the enterprises and stakeholders to whom the profession renders service. Such discovery is the best career advice to give to young people making up their minds on what they want to do.

I’m very often called on to provide introductory primers to audiences of nonprofit implementers on what internal audit is and even on “how to pass the audit”. I love doing it. I reveal novel insides like “auditors are people” and “don’t upset the auditors”. As I do, I sit back in my mind and marvel at audience reactions. You will be surprised how many people don’t know internal auditors are people. I also love giving insides on how to pass audit. It helps me dispel the fallacy that we auditors are some sadist evaluators looking to fail people, on job exams of sorts. All of that wrong on many levels.

One story I often invoke, in part to spice the conversation but equally to remind people of the organic basis for auditing is Shakespeare’s the Merchant of Venice. Imagine it. The people signed up for an internal audit introduction and then get to hear about Shakespeare’s work. So what‘s the connection? If you are like me and had to read the play in middle school, I hope you were as fascinated by “all that glitters is not gold” revelation in Act II, after all, is that not one lesson we all continue to learn in our adult lives and in the practice of audit? We call it professional skepticism today. But that was just the first digression. The play opens with a sad merchant, worried by the faith of his big bet investments. He has in effect placed all his eggs in one basket, in his case, vessels at sea. Another lesson on risk management and a second digression on my part.

The real lesson to draw in my view is what is missing from the merchant’s enterprise – an internal auditor. Many have questioned why Antonio (the merchant) was sad in the opening act of the play, filled with “melancholy”. Was it for his friend embarking on the consuming enterprise of marriage, that would take him away from their time together? Was it for parting away from his goods on vessels at sea? Was it for the unsavory feeling of making exorbitant profits like Shylock, the Semite he abhorred? I say Antonio was faced with a corporate governance challenge, impacting many stakeholders. An internal auditor could have helped him to examine the governance, risk management and control framework for his enterprise and activities. Consider the issues, financial risks of too much debt or loss due to pirates, market/demand risks if he invested in the wrong goods, operational risk if his ship captains failed to navigate safely, hazard risks from the seas, the social scorn from executive remuneration etc. His friends and collaborators tried, in their ways to be auditors of sorts, hinting at risks. He was sad and did not know why because the internal audit profession had not yet been created. Everyone paid dearly for not having auditors.

Blockchain: the auditing profession’s death nail?

Some people have said blockchain, at this stage, is like the internet in the early 1990′s. I argue it can never be too early to think about it or to jump on and particularly for auditors since it being called the “trust machine”.

For people, we have laws and regulations, including the legal systems, law enforcement authorities and lawyers. For assets or property, we have accounting principles, including financial recording/reporting systems, banks and exchanges, accountants and auditors. All of these, I have mentioned, form part of the elaborate mix of people, resources,  systems and tools that support and scale economic/financial trust i.e. they make business possible at scale.

ledger-1428230_1920

Auditors provide assurance (trust) w.r.t assertions that companies make in financial statements and about their internal controls. The assertions are well known, existence, completeness, rights and obligations, accuracy and valuation, and presentation and disclosure. A fundamental challenge that has come to the fore, with the growth of cyberspace, global interconnectedness and data proliferation, has been the continued effectiveness of the above mentioned trust system. Privacy concerns, unsanctioned use of data, fraud, rising intermediation costs (fees from financial institutions and others) have driven a search for alternative approaches to achieve reliable and safe financial and business transactions. Other factors such as reduced confidence in central institutions (banks, big social media companies, governments etc.) have equally contributed to the search for alternatives.

This is where blockchains have come in. And to clarify any confusion bitcoin is just a digital currency and it is based on the use of blockchain technology. It is the latter that is interesting. Many other blockchain uses exist, that where the excitement come it.

bitcoin-3132717_1920

Blockchain or to use the more general terminology, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), provides a new and formidable trust model for economic activity. Distributed ledgers maintain transactions or contracts in a decentralized manner, usually across different locations, people and computing systems. The use encryption and a concept called proof of work, so that transactions cannot be easily altered – a robust and immutable audit trail. The transactions can be of any type, for example of cash or of asset inventory. It eliminates the need of a central (trusted) authority to keep a check against manipulation. The benefits include reduced processing time, reduced transaction costs, transparency, security, low fraud and trust. Notice that in our current system we assume that the trusted party will not manipulate anything – we have been disproven, many times over on that assumption.

Like any new and major technology, it will affect jobs, career opportunities, job tasks and the value-add that current audit professionals provide. This will likely be in some unpredictable ways, hence some fear.  Some have predicted that distributed ledger technologies may eliminate 97% of the job auditors do. Others see it transforming audit work and creating new opportunities (see Journal of Accountancy article). Either way, it is clear that auditors should become familiar with distributed ledgers.

As an nonprofit auditor, I am particularly interested in what this will mean for the way we do business in the international arena and with less economically developed countries.

Has your CFO considered blockchain? Has your audit team considered what it will mean for its audit program and the skillsets to provide audits and deliver or value add? Please comment. The video link below provides a great overview.